Total Pageviews

Sunday, March 7, 2010

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, S.13--Ejectment--Bonafide requirement

(1) LAW HERALD (P&H) 77
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mehinder Singh Sullar
Civil Revision No.3064 of 2007
Pawan Kumar Mittal
v.
Girdhari Lal Saroya
{Decided on 25/11/2009}
For the Petitioner: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Majithia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailender Sharma and Mr. Jashan Preet Gill, Advocates.
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, S.13--Ejectment--Bonafide requirement--Landlord proved that bonafide required demised premises for running business after his retirement--Both Courts below currently ordered ejectment of tenant in right perspective--Order of ejectment affirmed. (P.20 & 21)

-------------