PUNJAB LAND REVENUE ACT, 1887

PUNJAB LAND REVENUE ACT, 1887
S.111--Partition--Denovo Partition--Mode of partition settled--Naksha Zeem was called for--No need to remand matter for denovo partition.; Jeet Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner, Appeals – II, Punjab and others,: 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) (DB) 550
S.111--Partition--Withdrawal from--Mode of partition sanctioned after hearing both parties--‘Naksha Be’ also approved by Assistant Collector--Thereafter application for withdrawal of partition on ground that 6 Bighas and 15 Marlas of land was not included in partition--Not proper--No appeal filed against confirmation of ‘Naksha Be’--After confirmation of mode of partition appellants cannot be permitted to withdraw from partition--Order of FC remanding matter for denovo partition rightly set aside.; Jeet Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner, Appeals – II, Punjab and others,: 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) (DB) 550

Entries in Jamabandi--Suit for possession and declaration--On the basis of bald, solitary and stray entry

2010(1) LAW HERALD (P&H) 458
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Regular Second Appeal No. 2520 of 2001
Sher Singh & Ors.
v.
Smt. Sarti & Anr.
{Decided on 25/01/2010}
For the Appellants: Mr. Prabodh Mittal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate.
Punjab Land Revenue Act--Revenue Record--Entries in Jamabandi--Suit for possession and declaration--On the basis of bald, solitary and stray entry in jamabandi for 1961-62 in favour of the plaintiffs, they cannot be held to be in possession of 1/3rd share of the suit land when all the subsequent revenue entries for almost 30 years till filing of the suit did not depict the possession of the plaintiffs over any part of the suit land. (P.13)