Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label COURT FEES ACT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COURT FEES ACT. Show all posts

Friday, June 18, 2010

COURT FEES ACT, 1870

Ad-valorem Court Fee--Definite case of plaintiff that amount of Rs. 19,41,261.1 is due from defendant although some more amount may also be due--Plaintiff has camouflaged its claim by making prayer for settlement of account only but in fact plaintiff is seeking recovery of amount found due--Plaintiff has to pay ad-volorem Court fee on aforesaid amount.; M/s Maha Singh Ram Mehar Rice & General Mills v. M/s Devi Dyal Amar Nath, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 762
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.149--Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.7, R.11(C)--Deficit Court Fee--Plaintiff paid deficit court fee within time granted in first instance by Trial Court as required by Order 7, Rule 11(c)--Plaint could not be rejected on ground of deficit Court fee.; Bikkar Singh v. Jeet Singh, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 748

COURT FEES ACT, 1870

Ad-valorem Court Fee--Definite case of plaintiff that amount of Rs. 19,41,261.1 is due from defendant although some more amount may also be due--Plaintiff has camouflaged its claim by making prayer for settlement of account only but in fact plaintiff is seeking recovery of amount found due--Plaintiff has to pay ad-volorem Court fee on aforesaid amount.; M/s Maha Singh Ram Mehar Rice & General Mills v. M/s Devi Dyal Amar Nath, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 762
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.149--Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.7, R.11(C)--Deficit Court Fee--Plaintiff paid deficit court fee within time granted in first instance by Trial Court as required by Order 7, Rule 11(c)--Plaint could not be rejected on ground of deficit Court fee.; Bikkar Singh v. Jeet Singh, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 748