Allotment of Govt. Accommodation--Petitioner became govt. servant during period of two months for which retiring govt. servant in entitled to retain possession--His stay with retiring Govt. servant was shown to have been for more than six months--Petitioner is entitled to such allotment and occupation and question of penalty does not arise.; Narain Saran Dass v. Chandigarh (Union Territory) Administration & Ors., ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 751
Allotment of Govt. Accommodation--Two qualifications to be fulfilled are--;
(i) That he a Government servant eligible for general pool accommodation.;
(ii) That he has been sharing the accommodation with the retiring officer for at least six months before the date of retirement.; Narain Saran Dass v. Chandigarh (Union Territory) Administration & Ors., ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 751
READ HEAD NOTES TO JUDGEMENTS OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ALSO LAWS OF PUNJAB, HARYANA & CHANDIGARH (UT)
Total Pageviews
Showing posts with label 1972. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1972. Show all posts
Friday, June 18, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Selection of Permissible area--Applicability of Sections 8(3) of Haryana Act
2010(1) LAW HERALD (P&H) 190
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mehinder Singh Sullar
Civil Writ Petition No.2979 of 1989
Mohan Singh (D) tho. Kirpal Singh & Ors.
v.
State of Haryana & Ors.
{Decided on 18/11/2009}
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Khetarpal, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.1: Mr. Anil Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana
For the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: Mr. P.N.Aggarwal, Advocate.
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953--Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, S.8(3), 12 & 33--Selection of Permissible area--Applicability of Sections 8(3) of Haryana Act--Land in dispute declared surplus under Punjab Act had already vested in State of Haryana after commencement of Haryana Act--Surplus area case of big landowner stood finally decided and cannot legally be reopened--But land exceeding permissible area so calculated shall be surplus area of person and in case area left with him after such transfer or disposition is equal to surplus area so calculated the entire area left with time shall be deemed to be surplus area--If area left with him is less than surplus area so calculated entire area and to extent of deficiency in it land so transferred or disposed of shall also be deemed to be surplus area--Petitioner are entitled to benefit in respect of selection of permissible area under Section 8(3) of Haryana Act--Matter remitted for limited purpose to consider case of petitioners for grant of benefit under Section 8(3) of Haryana Act only.
------------
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mehinder Singh Sullar
Civil Writ Petition No.2979 of 1989
Mohan Singh (D) tho. Kirpal Singh & Ors.
v.
State of Haryana & Ors.
{Decided on 18/11/2009}
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Khetarpal, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.1: Mr. Anil Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana
For the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: Mr. P.N.Aggarwal, Advocate.
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953--Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, S.8(3), 12 & 33--Selection of Permissible area--Applicability of Sections 8(3) of Haryana Act--Land in dispute declared surplus under Punjab Act had already vested in State of Haryana after commencement of Haryana Act--Surplus area case of big landowner stood finally decided and cannot legally be reopened--But land exceeding permissible area so calculated shall be surplus area of person and in case area left with him after such transfer or disposition is equal to surplus area so calculated the entire area left with time shall be deemed to be surplus area--If area left with him is less than surplus area so calculated entire area and to extent of deficiency in it land so transferred or disposed of shall also be deemed to be surplus area--Petitioner are entitled to benefit in respect of selection of permissible area under Section 8(3) of Haryana Act--Matter remitted for limited purpose to consider case of petitioners for grant of benefit under Section 8(3) of Haryana Act only.
------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)