Insecticide Rules, 1971

Insecticide Rules, 1971
R.27(5)--Insecticides Act, 1968, S. 3(k) (i), 17, 18, 29 & 33--Quashing of complaint--Misbranding of sample--Sample of insecticide taken from original packing by Insecticide Inspector--Nothing on record that insecticide of which sample was drawn was not stored in same state--Sample not tempered with--Petitioner being dealer/distributor cannot be held liable--Complaint qua petitioner quashed.; Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 810

Insecticide Rules, 1971

Insecticide Rules, 1971
R.27(5)--Insecticides Act, 1968, S. 3(k) (i), 17, 18, 29 & 33--Quashing of complaint--Misbranding of sample--Sample of insecticide taken from original packing by Insecticide Inspector--Nothing on record that insecticide of which sample was drawn was not stored in same state--Sample not tempered with--Petitioner being dealer/distributor cannot be held liable--Complaint qua petitioner quashed.; Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 810

Insecticide Rules, 1971

R.27(5)--Insecticides Act, 1968, S. 3(k) (i), 17, 18, 29 & 33--Quashing of complaint--Misbranding of sample--Sample of insecticide taken from original packing by Insecticide Inspector--Nothing on record that insecticide of which sample was drawn was not stored in same state--Sample not tempered with--Petitioner being dealer/distributor cannot be held liable--Complaint qua petitioner quashed.; Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 810

Insecticide Rules, 1971

R.27(5)--Insecticides Act, 1968, S. 3(k) (i), 17, 18, 29 & 33--Quashing of complaint--Misbranding of sample--Sample of insecticide taken from original packing by Insecticide Inspector--Nothing on record that insecticide of which sample was drawn was not stored in same state--Sample not tempered with--Petitioner being dealer/distributor cannot be held liable--Complaint qua petitioner quashed.; Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab, ; 2010(1) Law Herald (P&H) 810

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, S.10 & 12

2010(1) LAW HERALD (P&H) (DB) 317
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(DIVISION BENCH)
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurdev Singh
L.P.A. No.1338 of 2009(O&M)
Manav Rachna International University & Ors.
v.
Jitendra Chaudhary
{Decided on 03/12/2009}
For the Appellant: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate.
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, S.10 & 12--Contempt--Suo moto contempt proceedings initiated against Principal Director of deemed university--Respondent not allowed to join class in compliance of order of Court--False complaint filed against respondent under Section 107 & 151 Cr.P.C. with a view to restrain him from entering premises of university--Clear contempt made out--No interference.
------------